[James Blint]

The whole premise of the system is that getting a position doesn't earn you a disproportionate amount of points compared to having one less incident, otherwise people would just always ram the guy ahead and get more points for it than not doing it, which sometimes already happen even if it's not "reasonable" from the standing point of view or rating. So the system cannot have like 20 points difference between 2nd and the 3rd for example, especially as yes reports do some justice but they don't invalidate results, give you penalties on the fly while racing or severe damages, like it would in rl motorsports.

I don't think it would be fair for someone to win a champ with five 102 compared to someone racing the whole 6 tracks and getting the best results overall of all the participants. I could see how it would even lower participation as everyone would rule out the tracks they are less comfortable with in the series.