[Pete Parisetti]

Yeah, if some new "Incident Rating" was the average of the last 50 races you actually finished in the top 15 (I'm already poking holes in this... one could easily have 0 incidents by simply registering for and not actually participating in fully 50 races), then that number might actually mean something.

You have a point there, Russel, but only in theory, methinks. 

In practice, I believe that if somebody bothers with registering and not racing just to lower their inc rating, that somebody takes racing seriously and probably would not be a troublemaker anyway. Maybe one or two would do that and still be s#@theads when in a race, but I think that for the vast majority a safety rating simply based on the last 50 races would suffice. 

What do others think? Is this something that we can bring to the Admin's attention?