11-19-2017, 10:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-19-2017, 10:57 AM by Ben Russell.)
It has been a subject of discussion over on the Discord Channel a fair bit in regards to the Ratings set race series, and how it could maybe be refined.
Currently, the MX5 series requires a rating of 500+ and the Euro GT series requires 200+ (Oddly the US and ASIA GT Series has no rating requirement).
Could it maybe be beneficial to have some of the faster series, GT2 for example, to require a higher rating and the slower cars MX5 etc to not have such a high rating for entry, if at all?
I wonder what the thinking is behind it? Are slower cars more likely to require more driving experience, as they don't handle as well, hence the higher rating requirement? Or do the GT series cars not require so much?
It's not a criticism, just some thoughts and questions.
Another thought, could the series be staggered more, a bit like iRacing, whereby you start off in slower cars and work your way up through the series, to faster cars? Would that work? I don't know.
Would be interesting to know what SRS and others think about this train of thought
Currently, the MX5 series requires a rating of 500+ and the Euro GT series requires 200+ (Oddly the US and ASIA GT Series has no rating requirement).
Could it maybe be beneficial to have some of the faster series, GT2 for example, to require a higher rating and the slower cars MX5 etc to not have such a high rating for entry, if at all?
I wonder what the thinking is behind it? Are slower cars more likely to require more driving experience, as they don't handle as well, hence the higher rating requirement? Or do the GT series cars not require so much?
It's not a criticism, just some thoughts and questions.
Another thought, could the series be staggered more, a bit like iRacing, whereby you start off in slower cars and work your way up through the series, to faster cars? Would that work? I don't know.
Would be interesting to know what SRS and others think about this train of thought