[João Dias]

Yea I think it is pretty unfair how this is treated.
I always try to talk to people before fulfill a protest form, like an adult should handle things and so the adiministration wouldnt be cram with bureaucracy.

But now, in my 2nd formal warning ever, I got a 3 day suspension for an average incident (which I personaly consider average, since i dont even saved the replay of this specific race nor remeber whoever I hit and the incident itself) and the protester did not even had the decency to send me a pm clarifying things. It is his right, I know, but not the way we should handle things in a community.

A 3 day suspension for a rear hit and in a lagged formula server as the 2nd warning ever. How is this justice?

---

 It is quite likely that quite a few folks in any given race are seeing the current car/track combo for the FIRST TIME EVER. Being right on someone's tail who fits this description is very likely going to result in you plowing into them at the next semi-challenging corner. I pretty much assume that if someone in front of me does not have lap times in the top five on the server that they don't know a perfect line or a handle on brake points or corner exits, and I'll watch them closely before trying any sort of overtake. 

You can avoid hitting them by assuming they aren't a professional race car driver and then pretending that you are both driving vehicles worth well over your yearly salary.

It happend to me alot, people who doesnt know the track trying to dispute and endingup ramming me.. It is impossible to protest against every incident like this since there wouldnt be enough GB in my google drive to upload that many replays and no one would have that spare time. And yet I am the one being suspended in the 2nd warning when a lot of wreckless people get to be able to race just because we are more tolerant.

It seems these veredicts are harsher to who races more.