10-25-2019, 01:02 PM
Isn't it pretty useless as an indicator of how good someone is?
Because a person who took part in one race of a six-race series and came 3rd would have a lower (=better) SP than someone who won the other 5. Maybe it should be AP: average position, i.e. SP divided by the number of races the person was in.
Because a person who took part in one race of a six-race series and came 3rd would have a lower (=better) SP than someone who won the other 5. Maybe it should be AP: average position, i.e. SP divided by the number of races the person was in.